In the reply to this Letter the following
Number should be quoted,
ECEIV
C.O. 30 DEC
1872
Very pressing
D
Treasury
277
12731
Chambers
28th December 1872
Sir,
In reply to your letter of the 20th inst., I am directed by the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury to point out that, in the case of an additional payment to an officer in receipt of a public salary being considered the only, or at least the best, person to perform a public duty unconnected with his own office (which are the circumstances of the present case) such payment from Imperial Funds is not in question, and where also the Colonial Office...
...
R. H. Meade.
Colonial Office
}
In the reply to this Letter the following
19.378
Number should be quoted,
ECEIV
C.O. 30 DEC
1872
Very pressing
D
Treasury
277
12731
Chambers
28th December 1872
Sir.
In reply
to
your
letter
by
of the 20th inst: I am directed
the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty'; Treasury to point out
additional payment
see Ireasing that,
to
cohere
no
1901 to from Imperial Funds is Ceylon question, and where also
de Hon :
in
a
particular officer in receipt of a public Salary is considered to
be the only, or at least by for the best, person
to perform
public duty
his own.
unconnected.
office ( which
tome›
with
are
the
circumstances of the present
care) Zelly
R. H. Meade.
Lords do not consider
it
S
Colonial Office
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.